Hotels guilty until proven guilty with online reviews
Hotels guilty until proven guilty with online reviews
26 SEPTEMBER 2019 7:47 AM

Online hotel reviews are abused by some for personal gain, and unfortunately hoteliers are mostly powerless to correct this.

Even now at the asset manager level for a luxury boutique hotel, I find myself evaluating online reviews on TripAdvisor, Expedia and other major third-party rating services, both because I understand their influence with guests and also as a quality control measure.

Hoteliers all covet ratings that approximate a perfect five stars as we know that each platform can be easily aggregated to show rankings in descending order. In this flawed system where hotels aren’t readily segregated by class, you can potentially lose top placement to a cruddy motel down the road simply because the innkeeper there has time to chat up the temporary inhabitants of all eight rooms under his or her purview.

Thus, negative responses are put under a microscope because they are seriously damaging to future revenues. It’s under these conditions that certain guests have come to abuse this system for personal gain, vocally or implicitly threatening properties for discounts and comps when their lofty expectations aren’t egregiously surpassed.

Situational analysis
Here are four such examples from my recent endeavors working hands-on with independent hotels. You tell me if you think the low star rating was deserved or not.

1. Spa rescheduling
One morning, two spa service providers phone in sick and the spa manager cannot find replacements on short notice. Immediately, she calls the customer to advise that the service has to be rescheduled. The customer says her “entire day has been ruined” and that she “simply cannot accept that a replacement could not be found.” The customer then gives a one-star review on TripAdvisor, not citing any other flaws in the hotel. Of note, this client was a day spa user and not even an overnight guest of the property.

2. Missed reservations
A guest of the hotel books a 6:45 p.m. dinner reservation for two on a busy Saturday night. Without any prior notice, this couple arrives at 8:30 p.m. Unsurprisingly, the restaurant is full; they are asked to wait at the bar until a table is available. The couple is given a complementary glass of champagne and appetizers while waiting. Champagne consumed, the two guests order their meals for takeout to the room. With no comments left on the quality of the takeout food itself, do you think the restaurant deserves to lose a full three stars because the guests couldn’t commit to their allotted timeslot?

3. Broken hot tub
A couple is staying in a room with a jacuzzi tub and a separate shower. They go to use the Jacuzzi, and it does not work properly. Maintenance promptly arrives and notes that the timer control works for about a minute then stops–an issue that could not be identified by housekeeping during a room inspection. The guests are moved to another room that’s two categories higher, which they remark is fantastic. They also receive a complimentary bottle of champagne and an apology from the manager on duty. No other issues from the guest, yet another two-star review notched.

4. Billing snafu
One diner orders the risotto from the menu. Upon its arrival, the guest claims the risotto is not the way she likes it. The order is taken back and a new dish is provided. The diner then remarks to the server that the replacement is exceptional. As compensation, two desserts are offered and accepted. The guest check deletes the risotto and comps the desserts but charges for the replacement main. The guest pays then blasts the restaurant with a one-star review for an inaccurate bill.

So, what can the hotel owner to do in each of these situations? You can respond to each review as accurately as you can and explain your side of the story. But it is a slippery slope to avoid being accused as unfriendly. Most customers won’t have time to read the reviews let alone the manager’s responses; they only see the defamatory star ratings.

Course correction
A fundamental of our justice system was William Blackstone’s “Commentaries on the Laws of England” published in the 1706s. Paraphrasing, it stated that it was far better to have 10 guilty men go free than to have one innocent be charged. This is one of the places where we derive the ‘innocent until proven guilty’ catchphrase.

However, in today’s harried pace of society, it appears that the presumption of guilt provides speed and efficiency, particularly in the absence of a formalized system of due process. Although this has ramifications far beyond guest reviews, there is definitely some abuse at work here whereby guests have all the power to destroy a hotel without recourse.

It’s not like we can sue a guest for libel. These are their “opinions,” and yet they carry so much weight. Nor is lobbying the platforms to remove the slanderous reviews a viable option as they are notoriously slow in following up.

Thus, the one-star rating remains on your permanent record, unaffected by any polite justification offered through the manager’s response. You are culpable in perpetuity based solely on the whims of your customers. You are guilty until proven guilty, with no chance of effectively demonstrating your innocence.

One of the reasons why Airbnb is the goliath it is today is because of how it has perfected the two-way rating system. On its platform, both host and guest critique each other. If a customer accrues a bad reputation for being especially demanding or for leaving a slew of negative reviews, then a future host can take action to prevent said guest from staying at his or her abode. This approach seems to balance the equation.

I close out by asking what hoteliers can do to mitigate their losses? Obviously, your onsite services must be flawless, but even then there are always all factors beyond your control that may cause guests who are already inclined towards spitefulness to lash out online. How do we collectively go about fixing a system that is so heavily in favor of the guest?

One of the world’s most published writers in hospitality, Larry Mogelonsky is the principal of Hotel Mogel Consulting Limited, a Toronto-based consulting practice. His experience encompasses hotel properties around the world, both branded and independent, and ranging from luxury and boutique to select-service. Larry is also on several boards for companies focused on hotel technology. His work includes five books “Are You an Ostrich or a Llama?” (2012), “Llamas Rule” (2013), “Hotel Llama” (2015), “The Llama is Inn” (2017) and “The Hotel Mogel” (2018). You can reach Larry at to discuss hotel business challenges or to book speaking engagements.

The opinions expressed in this column do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Hotel News Now or its parent company, STR and its affiliated companies. Bloggers published on this site are given the freedom to express views that may be controversial, but our goal is to provoke thought and constructive discussion within our reader community. Please feel free to comment or contact an editor with any questions or concerns.


  • Justin September 26, 2019 7:04 PM Reply

    Excellent read and great points. I like having review websites, but I think you have to be "educated" in how to really dive into the reviews. It's tricky, like you point out, but the solution is hard. I think being able to give a review on something you didn't really try isn't fair to the establishment, but that comes with various issues as well.

  • Bob Eaton September 30, 2019 1:44 PM Reply

    It seems that the only recourse is mounting your own social-warfare campaign to garner more business to off-set the "losses" you have endured by inappropriate and misleading "ratings".

  • Joe Buhler September 30, 2019 5:05 PM Reply

    Despite these valid anecdotal reviews, the system still seems to work quite well in aggregate. Most travelers by now have enough experience with review sites which have been around for nearly two decades to know that the odd outlier comment either too positive or too negative should be discounted when making an assessment of a property. It is the sum total of all reviews that counts. This makes it all the more necessary for property owners to actively solicit reviews using a system so that there are enough reviews generated to at least diminish those outliers. This doesn’t have to be that time consuming when using an outside agency with a reputable system to manage this essential branding tool.

  • Monica Howard October 3, 2019 9:05 AM Reply

    Great read, Larry and as I read the examples, I could definitely see how things can go awry with customer reviews. I wonder if there has been any discussion about changing the review procedures? For example, offering a hotel customer the mandatory option of reviewing the hotel room/staff vs. the restaurant/bar vs. hotel spa? Would that distinction even matter? Would readers pay attention to the differentiation?

    I also love the idea you mentioned in making those reviews go both ways. There are definitely 'difficult' guests who make it a point to find everything wrong with a property/experience and only talk about those things. It can definitely be frustrating for hospitality teams working hard to accommodate guests.

  • Kevin Yaxley October 7, 2019 4:44 PM Reply

    Review website administrators could six monthly remove / delete the top 1% of all reviews and delete the bottom 1% of all reviews. If this were system generated it would be seemless and impartial and thus the vindictive reviews would be deleted and the solicited / friend reviews would also be deleted.

Comments that include blatant advertisements or links to products or company websites will be removed to avoid instances of spam. Also, comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Hotel News Now or its parent company, STR and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff.