This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Find out more here  Close
How effective is your revenue meeting?
May 15 2013

A viable weekly revenue meeting should involve four structured components, not last longer than an hour and include an ample dose of accountability.

Highlights
  • A viable weekly revenue meeting should involve four structured components, should not last longer than an hour and should include an ample dose of accountability.
  • Assign each member of the revenue team one competitor to research and follow.
  • Make every revenue team member accountable for key pieces of information.
By Bonnie Buckhiester
HNN columnist
bonnie@buckhiester.com

It’s Wednesday morning at 10 a.m. The boardroom’s booked, the report packages are ready and the “usual suspects” enter the room to participate in the week’s revenue-management meeting. The revenue manager has prepared the latest pick-up report, updated the rate shopping data, downloaded the STAR report and killed a few trees photo-copying all of it.

As the meeting comes to order, everyone is multitasking trying to answer at least two more emails on their smartphones before the “gavel” comes down demanding undivided attention. The meeting begins with a review of pick-up and some discussion on week-over-week results. Somehow, the meeting goes off on a tangent regarding some recurring issue and before you know it 20 minutes have passed. Sound familiar?

In my experience all too often this is an accurate example of the typical weekly revenue meeting. Now your hotel may be the exception, where highly effective revenue meetings take place every week, with full participation, ample collaboration and remarkable accountability. If this is an accurate description of your meetings, read no further.

If, on the other hand, there may be that remote chance that your weekly revenue meeting could be improved, then welcome to the real world. Considering how everyone is pressed for time these days and that the revenue meeting is a pretty expensive gathering of talent for most hotels, then it’s important to get it right. What would getting it right look like? Consider the following.

A viable weekly revenue meeting should involve four structured components, should not last longer than an hour and should include an ample dose of accountability. Once a month a fifth component should be added. Imagine these components like concentric circles on a target—the meeting starts with the outermost circle and involves relevant general information, then proceeds to move progressively to more detailed and specific property information until the meeting reaches the center of the target where strategies and tactics are finalized. The five key components include:

  1. Marketplace dynamics and general economic climate;
  2. competitive information;
  3. property performance trends;
  4. sell strategy development; and
  5. a month-end postmortem plus a 365-day outlook (once a month).

Responsibility for these components should be assigned to different members of the revenue team, with marketplace information handled by the director of sales and marketing or, in a smaller hotel, the GM. This part of the meeting is all about the general economic climate, marketplace activities (conferences, sporting events or community events), city or resort seasonal promotions, public relations efforts, new or renovated properties, etc. The key is to highlight circumstances that have an impact on demand, and these may be demand generators or detractors. This discussion sets the stage for the next component.

The second step is to zero in on competitive information and activities. This typically involves the revenue manager, the front office manager and the director of sales. Topics often include general rate positioning (data from a rate shopping tool, a local call-around, Google Hotel Finder, etc.), competitor marketing initiatives, Google Alerts, Technorati feedback, reputation-management reports, STAR indices, etc. This component is about any information and/or data that can help the team better understand the competitive landscape. What measures are your competitors taking that impact your ability to optimize demand?

For this part of the meeting it’s helpful to assign each member of the revenue team one competitor to research and follow. They become the subject matter expert on that competitor, and they are responsible for knowing what that competitor is up to at all times. It’s impossible for the revenue manager to keep on top of every move every competitor makes. The extra hands will ensure that little is missed. And this research means being on the competitor’s email list, following them on Facebook and Twitter, checking for blogs posts and/or Google alerts, looking for YouTube videos, etc.

Once the marketplace and competitive landscape have been reviewed, it’s time to showcase the property data. Too often the property data is introduced and discussed first, without the advantage of a relevant context. But by discussing marketplace dynamics and competitor information first, the revenue team then has a foundation or platform (a lens, if you will¬) from which to view their place in the competitive playing field. From this vantage point, the hotel stands a better chance of pinpointing opportunities and avoiding pitfalls.

The revenue manager typically leads this component of the meeting with assistance from other revenue team members as necessary. Depending on the type of hotel, this overview focuses on the next 60 to 90 days with longer horizons being examined when issues are present. Data review includes many different data sets:

  • Group and tour block pick-up/management;
  • constrained demand, STAR report data (with an emphasis on relative index balance);
  • global-distribution-system market capture/opportunities;
  • performance to budget and forecast;
  • week-over-week pace by market segment;
  • same time last year pace comparisons by market segment;
  • denials, rate resistance feedback, general reservations climate (all sources);
  • reservation call statistics (volumes, abandoned ratios, conversion ratios);
  • online conversion statistics (what’s selling? what isn’t?);
  • promotional offers, results of marketing initiatives, etc.;
  • rate and stay controls currently in place and impact on pace;
  • critical dates of high and low demand outside the 60- to 90-day window; and
  • consumer review scores/trends (reputation management) with an emphasis on the value score;

The assumption here is that the revenue manager has already reviewed this data and is able to guide the discussion to the most relevant pieces of information—those pieces have the strongest possibility to provide insight into demand trends.

The final component to the meeting involves setting sell levels. This involves price positioning, leveraging room types, optimizing stay patterns, balancing inventory, setting allocations by channel, adjusting transient protection based on new information, etc. This part of the meeting is a team effort and takes into consideration all of the previous pieces of information. If the first three components have been effectively and efficiently addressed, this part should be straightforward.

I’ve witnessed highly effective weekly revenue meetings that follow this structure and are completed in 60 minutes with the four standard components taking approximately 10, 15, 20 and 15 minutes, respectively. But to accomplish this, revenue team members have to come prepared and relevant data sets must be made available to team members in advance. Logistically, it’s best to have as little on paper as possible, use an overhead projector to share reports and have direct access to hotel systems during the meeting (property management, sales/catering, revenue management, central reservations, third-party intelligence and so on).

Finally, it’s advantageous to put aside one meeting a month that has a timeframe of 90 minutes in which two additional objectives can be accomplished. The first is a review of the results from the previous month, looking at what went right, what went wrong and what can we learn from the past. The second objective is to look forward 365 days, working with new information and updating sell strategies to optimize demand.

The key element in all of this is accountability. Make every revenue team member accountable for key pieces of information. It makes no sense to have the revenue manager do all the work while others show up for the meeting. When team members know they are responsible for certain parts of the meeting, the whole team benefits and sell strategies will be more carefully determined and more effective in fully optimizing demand.

About the Author
Bonnie E. Buckhiester, ISHC is President & CEO of Buckhiester Management Limited.  Bonnie’s career in travel, tourism and hospitality is extensive and multi-dimensional including positions as Senior Vice President, Operations for a major North American hotel REIT; General Manager for two 4½-diamond hotels, and General Manager Operations for a major tour operator. Her diverse product knowledge of hotel, tour, cruise, air, rail and car rental inventories offers a unique crossfertilization of industry strategies.

She holds a Bachelor Degree from the University of Illinois, a Certification in Revenue Management from Cornell University and a Certification from Guelph University’s Hospitality Managers Development Course. She’s the chairperson of the International Society of Hospitality Consultants and she is also a member of HSMAI’s Revenue Management Advisory Board. Bonnie is a sought after speaker internationally, an accomplished author of numerous industry articles, and a regular columnist for HotelNewsNow.

About HSMAI’s Revenue Management Advisory Board
The Revenue Management Advisory Board leverages insights, emerging trends, and industry innovations to guide the development of products and programs that optimize revenue for hotels.

Members include:
• Co-Chair:  Jon Eliot, CRME, CHA, Vice President of Revenue Management, Premier Hospitality Management
• Co-Chair:  Sloan Dean, CRME, Vice President of Sales & Marketing, Interstate Hotels & Resorts
• Calvin Anderson, Corporate Director of Revenue Strategy, Alliance Hospitality Management LLC
• Chris K. Anderson, Ph.D., Professor, Cornell University
• Bonnie Buckhiester, President & CEO, Buckhiester Management Limited
• Sheila Cosgrove, Director, Revenue Management Ops & Planning, Intercontinental Hotels Group
• Kathleen Cullen, CRME, Vice President Revenue Strategies, Heritage Hotels and Resorts
• Kent Duncan, CRME, Vice President, Sales & Revenue Strategy, Marcus Hotels & Resorts
• Tammy Farley, Principal, The Rainmaker Group
• Neal Fegan, CRME, Executive Director of Revenue Management, Fairmont Raffles Hotels International
• Kimberly Furlong, VP Revenue Management, TPG Hospitality
• Nick Graham, Sr. Director Market Management, Expedia, Inc.
• Jay Hubbs, Revenue Management Consultant
• Burl Hutchison, CRME, Director of Revenue & System Optimization, Sabre Hospitatlity
• Mark Molinari, CRME, Corporate Vice President of Revenue Management and Distribution, Las Vegas Sands
• Garth Peterson, CRME, Regional Director of Sales, IDeaS - A SAS Company
• Mark Robertson, Central Director Revenue Management, Wyndham Hotel Group
• Susan Spencer, Market Director - N. America, ChannelRUSH
• Trevor Stuart-Hill, CRME, President, Revenue Matters
• Paul Wood, CRME, CHBA, Vice President of Revenue Management, Greenwood Hospitality Group

Want to Learn More?
This topic will be addressed as part of the 10-part 2013 Revenue Management Webinar Series produced by the HSMAI Revenue Management Advisory Board and HSMAI University in partnership with HotelNewsNow and STR. Each month a webinar covers one aspect of cutting edge revenue management in today's economy in conjunction with articles written by members of the HSMAI Revenue Management Advisory Board. If you’re not able to attend a live program, archives are available.

Also, plan to attend HSMAI’s 2013 Revenue Optimization Conference (ROC) in Minneapolis on June 24..

The opinions expressed in this column do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HotelNewsNow.com or its parent company, STR and its affiliated companies. Columnists published on this site are given the freedom to express views that may be controversial, but our goal is to provoke thought and constructive discussion within our reader community. Please feel free to comment or contact an editor with any questions or concerns.

COMMENTS   Show All
Login or enter a name   Post Your Comment  Check to follow this thread via email alerts (must be logged in)
(4000 characters max)

Comments that include links or URLs will be removed to avoid instances of spam. Also, comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Hotel News Now or its parent company, STR and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff

TRENDING
Tiered Wi-Fi emerges as new industry model
Heartbleed a ‘significant’ threat to hotels
How to mitigate dependence on OTAs
Owners talk OTAs, branding, living wage
Omni Nashville GM hits hotel jackpot
The role of today’s management company
VIDEO
Hunter Hotel Conference postgame wrap
Bazin outlines Accor investment strategy
Accor's Bazin talks growth
Sébastien Bazin's view from the top
Chris Nassetta talks lifestyle brand
LATEST NEWS
US hotel transactions list
Hotel Equities’ Cerrone takes several paths
MGM JV has global goal for brands
Italy hotel market climbs, midscale a muddle
It’s time to fund highway improvements
Sustainability's deep roots
Contact Us
Hotel News Now
18500 Lake Rd.
Suite 310
Rocky River, Ohio 44116
        
Copyright © 2004 - 2014 Hotel News Now, a division of STR, Inc. All Rights Reserved.   Privacy